VFH vs VTIP
VFH vs VTIP · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VFH | VTIP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $121.32 | $49.99 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | VTIP |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $13.9B | $65.2B | VTIP |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VFH | VTIP |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.79% | +0.29% |
| 3M | -11.16% | +1.04% |
| 6M | -6.63% | +1.49% |
| YTD | -8.83% | +1.12% |
| 1Y | +16.52% | +3.85% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | VTIP | $0.02 |
| March 24, 2026 | VFH | $0.38 |
| December 18, 2025 | VTIP | $0.71 |
| December 17, 2025 | VFH | $0.68 |
| October 1, 2025 | VTIP | $0.65 |
| September 24, 2025 | VFH | $0.42 |
| July 1, 2025 | VTIP | $0.43 |
| June 26, 2025 | VFH | $0.47 |
| April 1, 2025 | VTIP | $0.10 |
| March 25, 2025 | VFH | $0.51 |
| December 24, 2024 | VTIP | $0.53 |
| December 18, 2024 | VFH | $0.66 |
| October 1, 2024 | VTIP | $0.31 |
| September 27, 2024 | VFH | $0.55 |
| July 1, 2024 | VTIP | $0.44 |
| June 28, 2024 | VFH | $0.46 |
| April 1, 2024 | VTIP | $0.03 |
| March 22, 2024 | VFH | $0.40 |
| December 22, 2023 | VTIP | $0.64 |
| December 19, 2023 | VFH | $0.54 |
Key Differences
VFH and VTIP serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
On the cost front, VTIP (0.03% expense ratio) is more economical than VFH (0.09%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $60.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, VTIP manages $65.2B compared to VFH's $13.9B. This size advantage typically means VTIP has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare VFH and VTIP
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VFH charges 0.09% and VTIP charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VFH or VTIP a better investment?
Whether VFH or VTIP is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VFH and VTIP differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VFH and VTIP?
VTIP has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VFH charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.06% difference costs approximately $6.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VFH or VTIP?
VTIP has $65.2B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VFH vs VTIP?
Both VFH and VTIP carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator