VFH vs VHT
VFH vs VHT · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VFH | VHT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $121.32 | $273.07 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.09% | — |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $13.9B | $20.3B | VHT |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VFH | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.79% | -3.69% |
| 3M | -11.16% | -4.94% |
| 6M | -6.63% | +2.27% |
| YTD | -8.83% | -4.78% |
| 1Y | +16.52% | +13.47% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 24, 2026 | VFH | $0.38 |
| March 24, 2026 | VHT | $0.99 |
| December 17, 2025 | VFH | $0.68 |
| December 17, 2025 | VHT | $1.67 |
| September 24, 2025 | VFH | $0.42 |
| September 24, 2025 | VHT | $1.08 |
| June 26, 2025 | VFH | $0.47 |
| June 26, 2025 | VHT | $0.96 |
| March 25, 2025 | VFH | $0.51 |
| March 25, 2025 | VHT | $0.94 |
| December 18, 2024 | VFH | $0.66 |
| December 18, 2024 | VHT | $0.92 |
| September 27, 2024 | VFH | $0.55 |
| September 27, 2024 | VHT | $1.17 |
| June 28, 2024 | VFH | $0.46 |
| June 28, 2024 | VHT | $0.97 |
| March 22, 2024 | VFH | $0.40 |
| March 22, 2024 | VHT | $0.82 |
| December 19, 2023 | VFH | $0.54 |
| December 19, 2023 | VHT | $0.90 |
Key Differences
VFH (VFH) and VHT (VHT) are both popular exchange-traded funds that investors frequently compare. Here is how they differ based on the latest available data.
Both VFH and VHT charge an expense ratio of 0.09%, making annual fund costs identical. On a $100,000 portfolio, both charge $90.00 per year in management fees.
VHT is the larger fund with $20.3B in assets under management — roughly 1.5x the size of VFH's $13.9B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare VFH and VHT
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VFH charges 0.09% and VHT charges 0.09%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VFH or VHT a better investment?
Whether VFH or VHT is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VFH and VHT differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VFH and VHT?
VFH has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while VHT charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.00% difference costs approximately $0.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VFH or VHT?
VHT has $20.3B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VFH vs VHT?
Both VFH and VHT carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator