VFH vs VOO
VFH vs VOO · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VFH | VOO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $121.32 | $602.99 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | VOO |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $13.9B | $1.5T | VOO |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VFH | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.79% | -3.50% |
| 3M | -11.16% | -4.36% |
| 6M | -6.63% | -1.41% |
| YTD | -8.83% | -3.55% |
| 1Y | +16.52% | +31.08% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 27, 2026 | VOO | $1.87 |
| March 24, 2026 | VFH | $0.38 |
| December 22, 2025 | VOO | $1.77 |
| December 17, 2025 | VFH | $0.68 |
| September 29, 2025 | VOO | $1.74 |
| September 24, 2025 | VFH | $0.42 |
| June 30, 2025 | VOO | $1.75 |
| June 26, 2025 | VFH | $0.47 |
| March 27, 2025 | VOO | $1.81 |
| March 25, 2025 | VFH | $0.51 |
| December 23, 2024 | VOO | $1.74 |
| December 18, 2024 | VFH | $0.66 |
| September 27, 2024 | VFH | $0.55 |
| September 27, 2024 | VOO | $1.64 |
| June 28, 2024 | VFH | $0.46 |
| June 28, 2024 | VOO | $1.78 |
| March 22, 2024 | VFH | $0.40 |
| March 22, 2024 | VOO | $1.54 |
| December 20, 2023 | VOO | $1.80 |
| December 19, 2023 | VFH | $0.54 |
Key Differences
When choosing between VFH and VOO, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
VOO charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is lower than VFH's 0.09%. This 0.06% difference translates to approximately $60.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $2,700.00.
VOO is the larger fund with $1.5T in assets under management — roughly 108.9x the size of VFH's $13.9B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing VFH and VOO. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare VFH and VOO
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VFH charges 0.09% and VOO charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VFH or VOO a better investment?
Whether VFH or VOO is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VFH and VOO differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VFH and VOO?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VFH charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.06% difference costs approximately $6.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VFH or VOO?
VOO has $1.5T in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VFH vs VOO?
Both VFH and VOO carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator