AGG vs BND
AGG vs BND · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | AGG | BND | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $99.23 | $73.58 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | — |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $141.2B | $395.3B | BND |
Performance Comparison
| Period | AGG | BND |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.67% | -0.69% |
| 3M | +0.16% | +0.16% |
| 6M | +1.01% | +0.97% |
| YTD | +0.32% | +0.31% |
| 1Y | +3.76% | +3.65% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | AGG | $0.34 |
| April 1, 2026 | BND | $0.25 |
| March 2, 2026 | AGG | $0.32 |
| March 2, 2026 | BND | $0.23 |
| February 2, 2026 | AGG | $0.33 |
| February 2, 2026 | BND | $0.25 |
| December 19, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| December 18, 2025 | BND | $0.25 |
| December 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| December 1, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| November 3, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| November 3, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| October 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| October 1, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| September 2, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| September 2, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| August 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| August 1, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| July 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.32 |
| July 1, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
Key Differences
When choosing between AGG and BND, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
Both AGG and BND charge an expense ratio of 0.03%, making annual fund costs identical. On a $100,000 portfolio, both charge $30.00 per year in management fees.
In terms of fund size, BND manages $395.3B compared to AGG's $141.2B. This size advantage typically means BND has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing AGG and BND. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare AGG and BND
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: AGG charges 0.03% and BND charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AGG or BND a better investment?
Whether AGG or BND is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. AGG and BND differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between AGG and BND?
AGG has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while BND charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.00% difference costs approximately $0.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, AGG or BND?
BND has $395.3B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in AGG vs BND?
Both AGG and BND carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator