VFH vs VGT
VFH vs VGT · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VFH | VGT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $121.32 | $712.65 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.09% | — |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $13.9B | $126.5B | VGT |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VFH | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.79% | -2.71% |
| 3M | -11.16% | -5.81% |
| 6M | -6.63% | -5.50% |
| YTD | -8.83% | -5.36% |
| 1Y | +16.52% | +49.54% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 24, 2026 | VFH | $0.38 |
| March 24, 2026 | VGT | $0.74 |
| December 17, 2025 | VFH | $0.68 |
| December 17, 2025 | VGT | $0.76 |
| September 24, 2025 | VFH | $0.42 |
| September 24, 2025 | VGT | $0.86 |
| June 26, 2025 | VFH | $0.47 |
| June 26, 2025 | VGT | $0.70 |
| March 25, 2025 | VFH | $0.51 |
| March 25, 2025 | VGT | $0.73 |
| December 18, 2024 | VFH | $0.66 |
| December 18, 2024 | VGT | $0.78 |
| September 27, 2024 | VFH | $0.55 |
| September 27, 2024 | VGT | $0.92 |
| June 28, 2024 | VFH | $0.46 |
| June 28, 2024 | VGT | $0.76 |
| March 22, 2024 | VFH | $0.40 |
| March 22, 2024 | VGT | $1.26 |
| December 19, 2023 | VFH | $0.54 |
| December 19, 2023 | VGT | $0.80 |
Key Differences
When choosing between VFH and VGT, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
Both VFH and VGT charge an expense ratio of 0.09%, making annual fund costs identical. On a $100,000 portfolio, both charge $90.00 per year in management fees.
In terms of fund size, VGT manages $126.5B compared to VFH's $13.9B. This size advantage typically means VGT has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing VFH and VGT. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare VFH and VGT
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VFH charges 0.09% and VGT charges 0.09%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VFH or VGT a better investment?
Whether VFH or VGT is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VFH and VGT differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VFH and VGT?
VFH has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while VGT charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.00% difference costs approximately $0.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VFH or VGT?
VGT has $126.5B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VFH vs VGT?
Both VFH and VGT carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator