VCSH vs VNQ
VCSH vs VNQ · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VCSH | VNQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $79.10 | $90.23 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.13% | VCSH |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $48.3B | $69.6B | VNQ |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VCSH | VNQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.33% | -3.58% |
| 3M | +0.15% | +2.79% |
| 6M | +1.38% | +0.66% |
| YTD | +0.29% | +3.06% |
| 1Y | +4.86% | +11.42% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| March 24, 2026 | VNQ | $0.95 |
| March 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.27 |
| February 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 22, 2025 | VNQ | $0.80 |
| December 18, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| November 3, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| October 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| September 24, 2025 | VNQ | $0.87 |
| September 2, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| August 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| July 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| June 26, 2025 | VNQ | $0.87 |
| June 2, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| May 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.28 |
| March 25, 2025 | VNQ | $0.93 |
| December 23, 2024 | VNQ | $0.86 |
| September 27, 2024 | VNQ | $0.81 |
| June 28, 2024 | VNQ | $1.03 |
Key Differences
When choosing between VCSH and VNQ, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
On the cost front, VCSH (0.03% expense ratio) is more economical than VNQ (0.13%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $100.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, VNQ manages $69.6B compared to VCSH's $48.3B. This size advantage typically means VNQ has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing VCSH and VNQ. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare VCSH and VNQ
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VCSH charges 0.03% and VNQ charges 0.13%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VCSH or VNQ a better investment?
Whether VCSH or VNQ is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VCSH and VNQ differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VCSH and VNQ?
VCSH has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VNQ charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.10% difference costs approximately $10.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VCSH or VNQ?
VNQ has $69.6B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VCSH vs VNQ?
Both VCSH and VNQ carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator