VCSH vs VHT
VCSH vs VHT · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VCSH | VHT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $79.10 | $273.07 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.09% | VCSH |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $48.3B | $20.3B | VCSH |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VCSH | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.33% | -3.69% |
| 3M | +0.15% | -4.94% |
| 6M | +1.38% | +2.27% |
| YTD | +0.29% | -4.78% |
| 1Y | +4.86% | +13.47% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| March 24, 2026 | VHT | $0.99 |
| March 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.27 |
| February 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 18, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 17, 2025 | VHT | $1.67 |
| December 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| November 3, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| October 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| September 24, 2025 | VHT | $1.08 |
| September 2, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| August 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| July 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| June 26, 2025 | VHT | $0.96 |
| June 2, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| May 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.28 |
| March 25, 2025 | VHT | $0.94 |
| December 18, 2024 | VHT | $0.92 |
| September 27, 2024 | VHT | $1.17 |
| June 28, 2024 | VHT | $0.97 |
Key Differences
When choosing between VCSH and VHT, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
VCSH charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is lower than VHT's 0.09%. This 0.06% difference translates to approximately $60.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $2,700.00.
VCSH is the larger fund with $48.3B in assets under management — roughly 2.4x the size of VHT's $20.3B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing VCSH and VHT. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare VCSH and VHT
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VCSH charges 0.03% and VHT charges 0.09%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VCSH or VHT a better investment?
Whether VCSH or VHT is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VCSH and VHT differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VCSH and VHT?
VCSH has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VHT charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.06% difference costs approximately $6.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VCSH or VHT?
VCSH has $48.3B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VCSH vs VHT?
Both VCSH and VHT carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator