VCSH vs VEA
VCSH vs VEA · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VCSH | VEA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $79.10 | $64.64 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | — |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $48.3B | $307.3B | VEA |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VCSH | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.33% | -1.58% |
| 3M | +0.15% | +1.25% |
| 6M | +1.38% | +7.84% |
| YTD | +0.29% | +3.65% |
| 1Y | +4.86% | +42.16% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| March 20, 2026 | VEA | $0.11 |
| March 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.27 |
| February 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 19, 2025 | VEA | $1.04 |
| December 18, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| November 3, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| October 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| September 19, 2025 | VEA | $0.29 |
| September 2, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| August 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| July 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| June 20, 2025 | VEA | $0.44 |
| June 2, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| May 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.28 |
| March 21, 2025 | VEA | $0.24 |
| December 20, 2024 | VEA | $0.71 |
| September 20, 2024 | VEA | $0.14 |
| June 21, 2024 | VEA | $0.46 |
Key Differences
VCSH and VEA serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
Both VCSH and VEA charge an expense ratio of 0.03%, making annual fund costs identical. On a $100,000 portfolio, both charge $30.00 per year in management fees.
VEA is the larger fund with $307.3B in assets under management — roughly 6.4x the size of VCSH's $48.3B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare VCSH and VEA
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VCSH charges 0.03% and VEA charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VCSH or VEA a better investment?
Whether VCSH or VEA is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VCSH and VEA differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VCSH and VEA?
VCSH has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VEA charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.00% difference costs approximately $0.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VCSH or VEA?
VEA has $307.3B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VCSH vs VEA?
Both VCSH and VEA carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator