VWO vs VYM
VWO vs VYM · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VWO | VYM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $53.82 | $148.11 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.04% | VYM |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $158.4B | $92.3B | VWO |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VWO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -1.88% | -2.03% |
| 3M | -2.66% | +2.17% |
| 6M | +0.16% | +5.95% |
| YTD | +0.11% | +3.80% |
| 1Y | +31.31% | +29.77% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 20, 2026 | VYM | $0.86 |
| December 19, 2025 | VWO | $1.03 |
| December 19, 2025 | VYM | $0.95 |
| September 19, 2025 | VWO | $0.28 |
| September 19, 2025 | VYM | $0.84 |
| June 20, 2025 | VWO | $0.14 |
| June 20, 2025 | VYM | $0.86 |
| March 21, 2025 | VWO | $0.05 |
| March 21, 2025 | VYM | $0.85 |
| December 20, 2024 | VWO | $1.07 |
| December 20, 2024 | VYM | $0.96 |
| September 20, 2024 | VWO | $0.13 |
| September 20, 2024 | VYM | $0.85 |
| June 21, 2024 | VWO | $0.17 |
| June 21, 2024 | VYM | $1.02 |
| March 15, 2024 | VWO | $0.04 |
| March 15, 2024 | VYM | $0.66 |
| December 18, 2023 | VWO | $0.87 |
| December 18, 2023 | VYM | $1.10 |
| September 18, 2023 | VWO | $0.33 |
Key Differences
When choosing between VWO and VYM, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
VYM charges an expense ratio of 0.04%, which is lower than VWO's 0.06%. This 0.02% difference translates to approximately $20.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $900.00.
VWO is the larger fund with $158.4B in assets under management — roughly 1.7x the size of VYM's $92.3B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare VWO and VYM
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VWO charges 0.06% and VYM charges 0.04%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VWO or VYM a better investment?
Whether VWO or VYM is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VWO and VYM differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VWO and VYM?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04%, while VWO charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.02% difference costs approximately $2.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VWO or VYM?
VWO has $158.4B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VWO vs VYM?
Both VWO and VYM carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator