VT vs VWO
VT vs VWO · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VT | VWO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $139.37 | $53.82 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.06% | — |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $83.5B | $158.4B | VWO |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VT | VWO |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.70% | -1.88% |
| 3M | -2.51% | -2.66% |
| 6M | +1.25% | +0.16% |
| YTD | -0.97% | +0.11% |
| 1Y | +34.33% | +31.31% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 20, 2026 | VT | $0.33 |
| December 19, 2025 | VT | $1.12 |
| December 19, 2025 | VWO | $1.03 |
| September 19, 2025 | VT | $0.48 |
| September 19, 2025 | VWO | $0.28 |
| June 20, 2025 | VT | $0.60 |
| June 20, 2025 | VWO | $0.14 |
| March 21, 2025 | VT | $0.39 |
| March 21, 2025 | VWO | $0.05 |
| December 20, 2024 | VT | $0.88 |
| December 20, 2024 | VWO | $1.07 |
| September 20, 2024 | VT | $0.42 |
| September 20, 2024 | VWO | $0.13 |
| June 21, 2024 | VT | $0.58 |
| June 21, 2024 | VWO | $0.17 |
| March 15, 2024 | VT | $0.42 |
| March 15, 2024 | VWO | $0.04 |
| December 18, 2023 | VT | $0.80 |
| December 18, 2023 | VWO | $0.87 |
| September 18, 2023 | VT | $0.41 |
Key Differences
VT and VWO serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
Both VT and VWO charge an expense ratio of 0.06%, making annual fund costs identical. On a $100,000 portfolio, both charge $60.00 per year in management fees.
VWO is the larger fund with $158.4B in assets under management — roughly 1.9x the size of VT's $83.5B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare VT and VWO
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VT charges 0.06% and VWO charges 0.06%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VT or VWO a better investment?
Whether VT or VWO is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VT and VWO differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VT and VWO?
VT has an expense ratio of 0.06%, while VWO charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.00% difference costs approximately $0.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VT or VWO?
VWO has $158.4B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VT vs VWO?
Both VT and VWO carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator