VGT vs VTI
VGT vs VTI · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VGT | VTI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $712.65 | $323.76 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | VTI |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $126.5B | $2.1T | VTI |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VGT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.71% | -3.34% |
| 3M | -5.81% | -4.15% |
| 6M | -5.50% | -1.30% |
| YTD | -5.36% | -3.13% |
| 1Y | +49.54% | +31.84% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 27, 2026 | VTI | $1.00 |
| March 24, 2026 | VGT | $0.74 |
| December 22, 2025 | VTI | $0.95 |
| December 17, 2025 | VGT | $0.76 |
| September 29, 2025 | VTI | $0.91 |
| September 24, 2025 | VGT | $0.86 |
| June 30, 2025 | VTI | $0.91 |
| June 26, 2025 | VGT | $0.70 |
| March 27, 2025 | VTI | $0.99 |
| March 25, 2025 | VGT | $0.73 |
| December 23, 2024 | VTI | $0.94 |
| December 18, 2024 | VGT | $0.78 |
| September 27, 2024 | VGT | $0.92 |
| September 27, 2024 | VTI | $0.87 |
| June 28, 2024 | VGT | $0.76 |
| June 28, 2024 | VTI | $0.95 |
| March 22, 2024 | VGT | $1.26 |
| March 22, 2024 | VTI | $0.91 |
| December 21, 2023 | VTI | $1.00 |
| December 19, 2023 | VGT | $0.80 |
Key Differences
VGT and VTI serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
VTI charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is lower than VGT's 0.09%. This 0.06% difference translates to approximately $60.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $2,700.00.
VTI is the larger fund with $2.1T in assets under management — roughly 16.5x the size of VGT's $126.5B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare VGT and VTI
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VGT charges 0.09% and VTI charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VGT or VTI a better investment?
Whether VGT or VTI is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VGT and VTI differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VGT and VTI?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VGT charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.06% difference costs approximately $6.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VGT or VTI?
VTI has $2.1T in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VGT vs VTI?
Both VGT and VTI carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator