VGT vs VOO
VGT vs VOO · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VGT | VOO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $712.65 | $602.99 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | VOO |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $126.5B | $1.5T | VOO |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VGT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.71% | -3.50% |
| 3M | -5.81% | -4.36% |
| 6M | -5.50% | -1.41% |
| YTD | -5.36% | -3.55% |
| 1Y | +49.54% | +31.08% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 27, 2026 | VOO | $1.87 |
| March 24, 2026 | VGT | $0.74 |
| December 22, 2025 | VOO | $1.77 |
| December 17, 2025 | VGT | $0.76 |
| September 29, 2025 | VOO | $1.74 |
| September 24, 2025 | VGT | $0.86 |
| June 30, 2025 | VOO | $1.75 |
| June 26, 2025 | VGT | $0.70 |
| March 27, 2025 | VOO | $1.81 |
| March 25, 2025 | VGT | $0.73 |
| December 23, 2024 | VOO | $1.74 |
| December 18, 2024 | VGT | $0.78 |
| September 27, 2024 | VGT | $0.92 |
| September 27, 2024 | VOO | $1.64 |
| June 28, 2024 | VGT | $0.76 |
| June 28, 2024 | VOO | $1.78 |
| March 22, 2024 | VGT | $1.26 |
| March 22, 2024 | VOO | $1.54 |
| December 20, 2023 | VOO | $1.80 |
| December 19, 2023 | VGT | $0.80 |
Key Differences
VGT (VGT) and VOO (VOO) are both popular exchange-traded funds that investors frequently compare. Here is how they differ based on the latest available data.
On the cost front, VOO (0.03% expense ratio) is more economical than VGT (0.09%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $60.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, VOO manages $1.5T compared to VGT's $126.5B. This size advantage typically means VOO has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing VGT and VOO. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare VGT and VOO
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VGT charges 0.09% and VOO charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VGT or VOO a better investment?
Whether VGT or VOO is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VGT and VOO differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VGT and VOO?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VGT charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.06% difference costs approximately $6.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VGT or VOO?
VOO has $1.5T in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VGT vs VOO?
Both VGT and VOO carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator