VGT vs VNQ
VGT vs VNQ · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VGT | VNQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $712.65 | $90.23 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.13% | VGT |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $126.5B | $69.6B | VGT |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VGT | VNQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.71% | -3.58% |
| 3M | -5.81% | +2.79% |
| 6M | -5.50% | +0.66% |
| YTD | -5.36% | +3.06% |
| 1Y | +49.54% | +11.42% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 24, 2026 | VGT | $0.74 |
| March 24, 2026 | VNQ | $0.95 |
| December 22, 2025 | VNQ | $0.80 |
| December 17, 2025 | VGT | $0.76 |
| September 24, 2025 | VGT | $0.86 |
| September 24, 2025 | VNQ | $0.87 |
| June 26, 2025 | VGT | $0.70 |
| June 26, 2025 | VNQ | $0.87 |
| March 25, 2025 | VGT | $0.73 |
| March 25, 2025 | VNQ | $0.93 |
| December 23, 2024 | VNQ | $0.86 |
| December 18, 2024 | VGT | $0.78 |
| September 27, 2024 | VGT | $0.92 |
| September 27, 2024 | VNQ | $0.81 |
| June 28, 2024 | VGT | $0.76 |
| June 28, 2024 | VNQ | $1.03 |
| March 22, 2024 | VGT | $1.26 |
| March 22, 2024 | VNQ | $0.73 |
| December 21, 2023 | VNQ | $1.07 |
| December 19, 2023 | VGT | $0.80 |
Key Differences
When choosing between VGT and VNQ, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
VGT charges an expense ratio of 0.09%, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13%. This 0.04% difference translates to approximately $40.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $1,800.00.
VGT is the larger fund with $126.5B in assets under management — roughly 1.8x the size of VNQ's $69.6B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare VGT and VNQ
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VGT charges 0.09% and VNQ charges 0.13%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VGT or VNQ a better investment?
Whether VGT or VNQ is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VGT and VNQ differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VGT and VNQ?
VGT has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while VNQ charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.04% difference costs approximately $4.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VGT or VNQ?
VGT has $126.5B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VGT vs VNQ?
Both VGT and VNQ carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator