VCSH vs VT
VCSH vs VT · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VCSH | VT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $79.10 | $139.37 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.06% | VCSH |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $48.3B | $83.5B | VT |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VCSH | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.33% | -2.70% |
| 3M | +0.15% | -2.51% |
| 6M | +1.38% | +1.25% |
| YTD | +0.29% | -0.97% |
| 1Y | +4.86% | +34.33% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| March 20, 2026 | VT | $0.33 |
| March 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.27 |
| February 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 19, 2025 | VT | $1.12 |
| December 18, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| November 3, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| October 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| September 19, 2025 | VT | $0.48 |
| September 2, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| August 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| July 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| June 20, 2025 | VT | $0.60 |
| June 2, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| May 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.28 |
| March 21, 2025 | VT | $0.39 |
| December 20, 2024 | VT | $0.88 |
| September 20, 2024 | VT | $0.42 |
| June 21, 2024 | VT | $0.58 |
Key Differences
VCSH (VCSH) and VT (VT) are both popular exchange-traded funds that investors frequently compare. Here is how they differ based on the latest available data.
VCSH charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is lower than VT's 0.06%. This 0.03% difference translates to approximately $30.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $1,350.00.
VT is the larger fund with $83.5B in assets under management — roughly 1.7x the size of VCSH's $48.3B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing VCSH and VT. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare VCSH and VT
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VCSH charges 0.03% and VT charges 0.06%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VCSH or VT a better investment?
Whether VCSH or VT is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VCSH and VT differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VCSH and VT?
VCSH has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.03% difference costs approximately $3.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VCSH or VT?
VT has $83.5B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VCSH vs VT?
Both VCSH and VT carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator