RSP vs SCHX
RSP vs SCHX · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | RSP | SCHX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $193.09 | $25.86 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | SCHX |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $90.7B | $64.1B | RSP |
Performance Comparison
| Period | RSP | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -3.30% | -3.52% |
| 3M | -0.38% | -4.55% |
| 6M | +1.80% | -1.77% |
| YTD | +1.23% | -3.63% |
| 1Y | +24.91% | +31.14% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 25, 2026 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| March 23, 2026 | RSP | $0.81 |
| December 22, 2025 | RSP | $0.76 |
| December 10, 2025 | SCHX | $0.08 |
| September 24, 2025 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| September 22, 2025 | RSP | $0.82 |
| June 25, 2025 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| June 23, 2025 | RSP | $0.72 |
| March 26, 2025 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| March 24, 2025 | RSP | $0.83 |
| December 23, 2024 | RSP | $0.62 |
| December 11, 2024 | SCHX | $0.08 |
| September 25, 2024 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| September 23, 2024 | RSP | $0.70 |
| June 26, 2024 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| June 24, 2024 | RSP | $0.66 |
| March 20, 2024 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| March 18, 2024 | RSP | $0.68 |
| December 18, 2023 | RSP | $0.61 |
| December 6, 2023 | SCHX | $0.07 |
Key Differences
When choosing between RSP and SCHX, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
On the cost front, SCHX (0.03% expense ratio) is more economical than RSP (0.20%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $170.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, RSP manages $90.7B compared to SCHX's $64.1B. This size advantage typically means RSP has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare RSP and SCHX
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: RSP charges 0.20% and SCHX charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is RSP or SCHX a better investment?
Whether RSP or SCHX is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. RSP and SCHX differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between RSP and SCHX?
SCHX has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while RSP charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.17% difference costs approximately $17.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, RSP or SCHX?
RSP has $90.7B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in RSP vs SCHX?
Both RSP and SCHX carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator