MDY vs VTI
MDY vs VTI · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | MDY | VTI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $622.40 | $323.76 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.03% | VTI |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $25.6B | $2.1T | VTI |
Performance Comparison
| Period | MDY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.20% | -3.34% |
| 3M | +0.74% | -4.15% |
| 6M | +4.25% | -1.30% |
| YTD | +3.42% | -3.13% |
| 1Y | +30.22% | +31.84% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 27, 2026 | VTI | $1.00 |
| March 20, 2026 | MDY | $1.52 |
| December 22, 2025 | VTI | $0.95 |
| December 19, 2025 | MDY | $2.18 |
| September 29, 2025 | VTI | $0.91 |
| September 19, 2025 | MDY | $1.62 |
| June 30, 2025 | VTI | $0.91 |
| June 20, 2025 | MDY | $1.80 |
| March 27, 2025 | VTI | $0.99 |
| March 21, 2025 | MDY | $1.31 |
| December 23, 2024 | VTI | $0.94 |
| December 20, 2024 | MDY | $2.08 |
| September 27, 2024 | VTI | $0.87 |
| September 20, 2024 | MDY | $1.65 |
| June 28, 2024 | VTI | $0.95 |
| June 21, 2024 | MDY | $2.00 |
| March 22, 2024 | VTI | $0.91 |
| March 15, 2024 | MDY | $1.01 |
| December 21, 2023 | VTI | $1.00 |
| December 15, 2023 | MDY | $1.89 |
Key Differences
When choosing between MDY and VTI, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
On the cost front, VTI (0.03% expense ratio) is more economical than MDY (0.23%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $200.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, VTI manages $2.1T compared to MDY's $25.6B. This size advantage typically means VTI has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing MDY and VTI. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare MDY and VTI
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: MDY charges 0.23% and VTI charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MDY or VTI a better investment?
Whether MDY or VTI is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. MDY and VTI differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between MDY and VTI?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while MDY charges 0.23%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.20% difference costs approximately $20.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, MDY or VTI?
VTI has $2.1T in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in MDY vs VTI?
Both MDY and VTI carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator