IWM vs VTI
IWM vs VTI · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | IWM | VTI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $251.29 | $323.76 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | VTI |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $74.0B | $2.1T | VTI |
Performance Comparison
| Period | IWM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -1.96% | -3.34% |
| 3M | -0.39% | -4.15% |
| 6M | +2.75% | -1.30% |
| YTD | +2.27% | -3.13% |
| 1Y | +40.18% | +31.84% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 27, 2026 | VTI | $1.00 |
| March 17, 2026 | IWM | $0.44 |
| December 22, 2025 | VTI | $0.95 |
| December 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.84 |
| September 29, 2025 | VTI | $0.91 |
| September 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.68 |
| June 30, 2025 | VTI | $0.91 |
| June 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.58 |
| March 27, 2025 | VTI | $0.99 |
| March 18, 2025 | IWM | $0.46 |
| December 23, 2024 | VTI | $0.94 |
| December 17, 2024 | IWM | $0.69 |
| September 27, 2024 | VTI | $0.87 |
| September 25, 2024 | IWM | $0.75 |
| June 28, 2024 | VTI | $0.95 |
| June 11, 2024 | IWM | $0.56 |
| March 22, 2024 | VTI | $0.91 |
| March 21, 2024 | IWM | $0.52 |
| December 21, 2023 | VTI | $1.00 |
| December 20, 2023 | IWM | $0.73 |
Key Differences
IWM (IWM) and VTI (VTI) are both popular exchange-traded funds that investors frequently compare. Here is how they differ based on the latest available data.
VTI charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is lower than IWM's 0.19%. This 0.16% difference translates to approximately $160.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $7,200.00.
VTI is the larger fund with $2.1T in assets under management — roughly 28.2x the size of IWM's $74.0B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing IWM and VTI. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare IWM and VTI
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: IWM charges 0.19% and VTI charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IWM or VTI a better investment?
Whether IWM or VTI is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. IWM and VTI differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between IWM and VTI?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while IWM charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.16% difference costs approximately $16.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, IWM or VTI?
VTI has $2.1T in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in IWM vs VTI?
Both IWM and VTI carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator