IWM vs NOBL
IWM vs NOBL · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | IWM | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $251.29 | $105.93 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.35% | IWM |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $74.0B | $12.0B | IWM |
Performance Comparison
| Period | IWM | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -1.96% | -4.25% |
| 3M | -0.39% | +1.25% |
| 6M | +2.75% | +3.17% |
| YTD | +2.27% | +2.28% |
| 1Y | +40.18% | +14.54% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 25, 2026 | NOBL | $0.51 |
| March 17, 2026 | IWM | $0.44 |
| December 24, 2025 | NOBL | $0.66 |
| December 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.84 |
| September 24, 2025 | NOBL | $0.55 |
| September 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.68 |
| June 25, 2025 | NOBL | $0.55 |
| June 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.58 |
| March 26, 2025 | NOBL | $0.47 |
| March 18, 2025 | IWM | $0.46 |
| December 23, 2024 | NOBL | $0.59 |
| December 17, 2024 | IWM | $0.69 |
| September 25, 2024 | IWM | $0.75 |
| September 25, 2024 | NOBL | $0.52 |
| June 26, 2024 | NOBL | $0.55 |
| June 11, 2024 | IWM | $0.56 |
| March 21, 2024 | IWM | $0.52 |
| March 20, 2024 | NOBL | $0.39 |
| December 20, 2023 | IWM | $0.73 |
| December 20, 2023 | NOBL | $0.66 |
Key Differences
IWM and NOBL serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
IWM charges an expense ratio of 0.19%, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35%. This 0.16% difference translates to approximately $160.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $7,200.00.
IWM is the larger fund with $74.0B in assets under management — roughly 6.2x the size of NOBL's $12.0B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare IWM and NOBL
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: IWM charges 0.19% and NOBL charges 0.35%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IWM or NOBL a better investment?
Whether IWM or NOBL is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. IWM and NOBL differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between IWM and NOBL?
IWM has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while NOBL charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.16% difference costs approximately $16.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, IWM or NOBL?
IWM has $74.0B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in IWM vs NOBL?
Both IWM and NOBL carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator