IWM vs JEPQ
IWM vs JEPQ · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | IWM | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $251.29 | $55.59 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.35% | IWM |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $74.0B | $34.6B | IWM |
Performance Comparison
| Period | IWM | JEPQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -1.96% | -2.58% |
| 3M | -0.39% | -2.29% |
| 6M | +2.75% | +2.45% |
| YTD | +2.27% | -1.76% |
| 1Y | +40.18% | +33.25% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | JEPQ | $0.56 |
| March 17, 2026 | IWM | $0.44 |
| March 2, 2026 | JEPQ | $0.51 |
| February 2, 2026 | JEPQ | $0.47 |
| December 31, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.58 |
| December 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.84 |
| December 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.55 |
| November 3, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.48 |
| October 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.45 |
| September 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.68 |
| September 2, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.44 |
| August 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.44 |
| July 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.49 |
| June 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.58 |
| June 2, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.62 |
| May 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.60 |
| March 18, 2025 | IWM | $0.46 |
| December 17, 2024 | IWM | $0.69 |
| September 25, 2024 | IWM | $0.75 |
| June 11, 2024 | IWM | $0.56 |
Key Differences
IWM (IWM) and JEPQ (JEPQ) are both popular exchange-traded funds that investors frequently compare. Here is how they differ based on the latest available data.
On the cost front, IWM (0.19% expense ratio) is more economical than JEPQ (0.35%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $160.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, IWM manages $74.0B compared to JEPQ's $34.6B. This size advantage typically means IWM has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare IWM and JEPQ
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: IWM charges 0.19% and JEPQ charges 0.35%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IWM or JEPQ a better investment?
Whether IWM or JEPQ is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. IWM and JEPQ differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between IWM and JEPQ?
IWM has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while JEPQ charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.16% difference costs approximately $16.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, IWM or JEPQ?
IWM has $74.0B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in IWM vs JEPQ?
Both IWM and JEPQ carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator