FBTC vs IBIT
FBTC vs IBIT · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | FBTC | IBIT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $58.36 | $37.97 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.25% | — |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $12.3B | $50.1B | IBIT |
Performance Comparison
| Period | FBTC | IBIT |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -5.95% | -5.99% |
| 3M | -28.92% | -28.97% |
| 6M | -45.54% | -45.61% |
| YTD | -23.44% | -23.52% |
| 1Y | -20.48% | -20.42% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
No dividend data available for these securities.
Key Differences
FBTC and IBIT serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
Both FBTC and IBIT charge an expense ratio of 0.25%, making annual fund costs identical. On a $100,000 portfolio, both charge $250.00 per year in management fees.
In terms of fund size, IBIT manages $50.1B compared to FBTC's $12.3B. This size advantage typically means IBIT has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare FBTC and IBIT
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: FBTC charges 0.25% and IBIT charges 0.25%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FBTC or IBIT a better investment?
Whether FBTC or IBIT is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. FBTC and IBIT differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between FBTC and IBIT?
FBTC has an expense ratio of 0.25%, while IBIT charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.00% difference costs approximately $0.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, FBTC or IBIT?
IBIT has $50.1B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in FBTC vs IBIT?
Both FBTC and IBIT carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator