FBTC vs HDV
FBTC vs HDV · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | FBTC | HDV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $58.36 | $133.99 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.08% | HDV |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $12.3B | $13.8B | HDV |
Performance Comparison
| Period | FBTC | HDV |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -5.95% | -1.24% |
| 3M | -28.92% | +10.19% |
| 6M | -45.54% | +11.32% |
| YTD | -23.44% | +10.87% |
| 1Y | -20.48% | +24.33% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 17, 2026 | HDV | $0.84 |
| December 16, 2025 | HDV | $1.25 |
| September 16, 2025 | HDV | $0.95 |
| June 16, 2025 | HDV | $0.91 |
| March 18, 2025 | HDV | $0.80 |
| December 17, 2024 | HDV | $1.12 |
| September 25, 2024 | HDV | $1.23 |
| June 11, 2024 | HDV | $0.93 |
| March 21, 2024 | HDV | $0.84 |
| December 20, 2023 | HDV | $0.98 |
| September 26, 2023 | HDV | $1.08 |
| June 7, 2023 | HDV | $0.80 |
Key Differences
FBTC and HDV serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
On the cost front, HDV (0.08% expense ratio) is more economical than FBTC (0.25%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $170.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, HDV manages $13.8B compared to FBTC's $12.3B. This size advantage typically means HDV has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare FBTC and HDV
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: FBTC charges 0.25% and HDV charges 0.08%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FBTC or HDV a better investment?
Whether FBTC or HDV is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. FBTC and HDV differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between FBTC and HDV?
HDV has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while FBTC charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.17% difference costs approximately $17.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, FBTC or HDV?
HDV has $13.8B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in FBTC vs HDV?
Both FBTC and HDV carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator