FBTC vs HYG
FBTC vs HYG · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | FBTC | HYG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $58.36 | $79.56 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.49% | FBTC |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $12.3B | $16.7B | HYG |
Performance Comparison
| Period | FBTC | HYG |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -5.95% | -0.17% |
| 3M | -28.92% | -0.18% |
| 6M | -45.54% | +1.32% |
| YTD | -23.44% | +0.13% |
| 1Y | -20.48% | +9.86% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | HYG | $0.38 |
| March 2, 2026 | HYG | $0.39 |
| February 2, 2026 | HYG | $0.40 |
| December 19, 2025 | HYG | $0.38 |
| December 1, 2025 | HYG | $0.38 |
| November 3, 2025 | HYG | $0.41 |
| October 1, 2025 | HYG | $0.38 |
| September 2, 2025 | HYG | $0.38 |
| August 1, 2025 | HYG | $0.40 |
| July 1, 2025 | HYG | $0.38 |
| June 2, 2025 | HYG | $0.38 |
| May 1, 2025 | HYG | $0.40 |
Key Differences
FBTC and HYG serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
On the cost front, FBTC (0.25% expense ratio) is more economical than HYG (0.49%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $240.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, HYG manages $16.7B compared to FBTC's $12.3B. This size advantage typically means HYG has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare FBTC and HYG
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: FBTC charges 0.25% and HYG charges 0.49%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FBTC or HYG a better investment?
Whether FBTC or HYG is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. FBTC and HYG differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between FBTC and HYG?
FBTC has an expense ratio of 0.25%, while HYG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.24% difference costs approximately $24.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, FBTC or HYG?
HYG has $16.7B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in FBTC vs HYG?
Both FBTC and HYG carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator