BND vs XLV
BND vs XLV · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | BND | XLV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $73.58 | $146.81 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.08% | BND |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $395.3B | $43.1B | BND |
Performance Comparison
| Period | BND | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.69% | -4.22% |
| 3M | +0.16% | -4.92% |
| 6M | +0.97% | +2.22% |
| YTD | +0.31% | -4.77% |
| 1Y | +3.65% | +10.46% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | BND | $0.25 |
| March 23, 2026 | XLV | $0.60 |
| March 2, 2026 | BND | $0.23 |
| February 2, 2026 | BND | $0.25 |
| December 22, 2025 | XLV | $0.66 |
| December 18, 2025 | BND | $0.25 |
| December 1, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| November 3, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| October 1, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| September 22, 2025 | XLV | $0.63 |
| September 2, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| August 1, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| July 1, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| June 23, 2025 | XLV | $0.63 |
| June 2, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| May 1, 2025 | BND | $0.24 |
| March 24, 2025 | XLV | $0.57 |
| December 23, 2024 | XLV | $0.62 |
| September 23, 2024 | XLV | $0.58 |
| June 24, 2024 | XLV | $0.57 |
Key Differences
BND and XLV serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
BND charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is lower than XLV's 0.08%. This 0.05% difference translates to approximately $50.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $2,250.00.
BND is the larger fund with $395.3B in assets under management — roughly 9.2x the size of XLV's $43.1B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare BND and XLV
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: BND charges 0.03% and XLV charges 0.08%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is BND or XLV a better investment?
Whether BND or XLV is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. BND and XLV differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between BND and XLV?
BND has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while XLV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.05% difference costs approximately $5.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, BND or XLV?
BND has $395.3B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in BND vs XLV?
Both BND and XLV carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator