AGG vs XLV
AGG vs XLV · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | AGG | XLV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $99.23 | $146.81 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.08% | AGG |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $141.2B | $43.1B | AGG |
Performance Comparison
| Period | AGG | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.67% | -4.22% |
| 3M | +0.16% | -4.92% |
| 6M | +1.01% | +2.22% |
| YTD | +0.32% | -4.77% |
| 1Y | +3.76% | +10.46% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | AGG | $0.34 |
| March 23, 2026 | XLV | $0.60 |
| March 2, 2026 | AGG | $0.32 |
| February 2, 2026 | AGG | $0.33 |
| December 22, 2025 | XLV | $0.66 |
| December 19, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| December 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| November 3, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| October 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| September 22, 2025 | XLV | $0.63 |
| September 2, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| August 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| July 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.32 |
| June 23, 2025 | XLV | $0.63 |
| June 2, 2025 | AGG | $0.32 |
| May 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.32 |
| March 24, 2025 | XLV | $0.57 |
| December 23, 2024 | XLV | $0.62 |
| September 23, 2024 | XLV | $0.58 |
| June 24, 2024 | XLV | $0.57 |
Key Differences
AGG and XLV serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
On the cost front, AGG (0.03% expense ratio) is more economical than XLV (0.08%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $50.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, AGG manages $141.2B compared to XLV's $43.1B. This size advantage typically means AGG has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare AGG and XLV
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: AGG charges 0.03% and XLV charges 0.08%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AGG or XLV a better investment?
Whether AGG or XLV is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. AGG and XLV differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between AGG and XLV?
AGG has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while XLV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.05% difference costs approximately $5.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, AGG or XLV?
AGG has $141.2B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in AGG vs XLV?
Both AGG and XLV carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator