AGG vs XLE
AGG vs XLE · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | AGG | XLE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $99.23 | $59.25 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.08% | AGG |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $141.2B | $37.9B | AGG |
Performance Comparison
| Period | AGG | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.67% | +5.59% |
| 3M | +0.16% | +27.19% |
| 6M | +1.01% | +35.30% |
| YTD | +0.32% | +33.39% |
| 1Y | +3.76% | +55.29% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | AGG | $0.34 |
| March 23, 2026 | XLE | $0.39 |
| March 2, 2026 | AGG | $0.32 |
| February 2, 2026 | AGG | $0.33 |
| December 22, 2025 | XLE | $0.37 |
| December 19, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| December 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| November 3, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| October 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| September 22, 2025 | XLE | $0.37 |
| September 2, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| August 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.33 |
| July 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.32 |
| June 23, 2025 | XLE | $0.36 |
| June 2, 2025 | AGG | $0.32 |
| May 1, 2025 | AGG | $0.32 |
| March 24, 2025 | XLE | $0.36 |
| December 23, 2024 | XLE | $0.35 |
| September 23, 2024 | XLE | $0.36 |
| June 24, 2024 | XLE | $0.36 |
Key Differences
When choosing between AGG and XLE, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
AGG charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is lower than XLE's 0.08%. This 0.05% difference translates to approximately $50.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $2,250.00.
AGG is the larger fund with $141.2B in assets under management — roughly 3.7x the size of XLE's $37.9B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing AGG and XLE. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare AGG and XLE
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: AGG charges 0.03% and XLE charges 0.08%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AGG or XLE a better investment?
Whether AGG or XLE is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. AGG and XLE differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between AGG and XLE?
AGG has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while XLE charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.05% difference costs approximately $5.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, AGG or XLE?
AGG has $141.2B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in AGG vs XLE?
Both AGG and XLE carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator