VNQ vs VWO
VNQ vs VWO · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VNQ | VWO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $90.23 | $53.82 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.13% | 0.06% | VWO |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $69.6B | $158.4B | VWO |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VNQ | VWO |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -3.58% | -1.88% |
| 3M | +2.79% | -2.66% |
| 6M | +0.66% | +0.16% |
| YTD | +3.06% | +0.11% |
| 1Y | +11.42% | +31.31% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 24, 2026 | VNQ | $0.95 |
| December 22, 2025 | VNQ | $0.80 |
| December 19, 2025 | VWO | $1.03 |
| September 24, 2025 | VNQ | $0.87 |
| September 19, 2025 | VWO | $0.28 |
| June 26, 2025 | VNQ | $0.87 |
| June 20, 2025 | VWO | $0.14 |
| March 25, 2025 | VNQ | $0.93 |
| March 21, 2025 | VWO | $0.05 |
| December 23, 2024 | VNQ | $0.86 |
| December 20, 2024 | VWO | $1.07 |
| September 27, 2024 | VNQ | $0.81 |
| September 20, 2024 | VWO | $0.13 |
| June 28, 2024 | VNQ | $1.03 |
| June 21, 2024 | VWO | $0.17 |
| March 22, 2024 | VNQ | $0.73 |
| March 15, 2024 | VWO | $0.04 |
| December 21, 2023 | VNQ | $1.07 |
| December 18, 2023 | VWO | $0.87 |
| September 28, 2023 | VNQ | $0.73 |
Key Differences
VNQ and VWO serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
On the cost front, VWO (0.06% expense ratio) is more economical than VNQ (0.13%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $70.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, VWO manages $158.4B compared to VNQ's $69.6B. This size advantage typically means VWO has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare VNQ and VWO
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VNQ charges 0.13% and VWO charges 0.06%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VNQ or VWO a better investment?
Whether VNQ or VWO is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VNQ and VWO differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VNQ and VWO?
VWO has an expense ratio of 0.06%, while VNQ charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.07% difference costs approximately $7.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VNQ or VWO?
VWO has $158.4B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VNQ vs VWO?
Both VNQ and VWO carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator