VHT vs VNQ
VHT vs VNQ · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VHT | VNQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $273.07 | $90.23 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.13% | VHT |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $20.3B | $69.6B | VNQ |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VHT | VNQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -3.69% | -3.58% |
| 3M | -4.94% | +2.79% |
| 6M | +2.27% | +0.66% |
| YTD | -4.78% | +3.06% |
| 1Y | +13.47% | +11.42% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 24, 2026 | VHT | $0.99 |
| March 24, 2026 | VNQ | $0.95 |
| December 22, 2025 | VNQ | $0.80 |
| December 17, 2025 | VHT | $1.67 |
| September 24, 2025 | VHT | $1.08 |
| September 24, 2025 | VNQ | $0.87 |
| June 26, 2025 | VHT | $0.96 |
| June 26, 2025 | VNQ | $0.87 |
| March 25, 2025 | VHT | $0.94 |
| March 25, 2025 | VNQ | $0.93 |
| December 23, 2024 | VNQ | $0.86 |
| December 18, 2024 | VHT | $0.92 |
| September 27, 2024 | VHT | $1.17 |
| September 27, 2024 | VNQ | $0.81 |
| June 28, 2024 | VHT | $0.97 |
| June 28, 2024 | VNQ | $1.03 |
| March 22, 2024 | VHT | $0.82 |
| March 22, 2024 | VNQ | $0.73 |
| December 21, 2023 | VNQ | $1.07 |
| December 19, 2023 | VHT | $0.90 |
Key Differences
VHT and VNQ serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
On the cost front, VHT (0.09% expense ratio) is more economical than VNQ (0.13%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $40.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, VNQ manages $69.6B compared to VHT's $20.3B. This size advantage typically means VNQ has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare VHT and VNQ
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VHT charges 0.09% and VNQ charges 0.13%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VHT or VNQ a better investment?
Whether VHT or VNQ is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VHT and VNQ differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VHT and VNQ?
VHT has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while VNQ charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.04% difference costs approximately $4.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VHT or VNQ?
VNQ has $69.6B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VHT vs VNQ?
Both VHT and VNQ carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator