VEA vs VGT
VEA vs VGT · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VEA | VGT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $64.64 | $712.65 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.09% | VEA |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $307.3B | $126.5B | VEA |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VEA | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -1.58% | -2.71% |
| 3M | +1.25% | -5.81% |
| 6M | +7.84% | -5.50% |
| YTD | +3.65% | -5.36% |
| 1Y | +42.16% | +49.54% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 24, 2026 | VGT | $0.74 |
| March 20, 2026 | VEA | $0.11 |
| December 19, 2025 | VEA | $1.04 |
| December 17, 2025 | VGT | $0.76 |
| September 24, 2025 | VGT | $0.86 |
| September 19, 2025 | VEA | $0.29 |
| June 26, 2025 | VGT | $0.70 |
| June 20, 2025 | VEA | $0.44 |
| March 25, 2025 | VGT | $0.73 |
| March 21, 2025 | VEA | $0.24 |
| December 20, 2024 | VEA | $0.71 |
| December 18, 2024 | VGT | $0.78 |
| September 27, 2024 | VGT | $0.92 |
| September 20, 2024 | VEA | $0.14 |
| June 28, 2024 | VGT | $0.76 |
| June 21, 2024 | VEA | $0.46 |
| March 22, 2024 | VGT | $1.26 |
| March 15, 2024 | VEA | $0.29 |
| December 19, 2023 | VGT | $0.80 |
| December 18, 2023 | VEA | $0.61 |
Key Differences
VEA (VEA) and VGT (VGT) are both popular exchange-traded funds that investors frequently compare. Here is how they differ based on the latest available data.
On the cost front, VEA (0.03% expense ratio) is more economical than VGT (0.09%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $60.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, VEA manages $307.3B compared to VGT's $126.5B. This size advantage typically means VEA has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare VEA and VGT
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VEA charges 0.03% and VGT charges 0.09%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VEA or VGT a better investment?
Whether VEA or VGT is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VEA and VGT differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VEA and VGT?
VEA has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VGT charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.06% difference costs approximately $6.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VEA or VGT?
VEA has $307.3B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VEA vs VGT?
Both VEA and VGT carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator