VCIT vs VCSH
VCIT vs VCSH · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | VCIT | VCSH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $82.74 | $79.10 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | — |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $68.5B | $48.3B | VCIT |
Performance Comparison
| Period | VCIT | VCSH |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.90% | -0.33% |
| 3M | -0.25% | +0.15% |
| 6M | +0.77% | +1.38% |
| YTD | -0.04% | +0.29% |
| 1Y | +6.05% | +4.86% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | VCIT | $0.34 |
| April 1, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| March 2, 2026 | VCIT | $0.30 |
| March 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.27 |
| February 2, 2026 | VCIT | $0.33 |
| February 2, 2026 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 18, 2025 | VCIT | $0.34 |
| December 18, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| December 1, 2025 | VCIT | $0.32 |
| December 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| November 3, 2025 | VCIT | $0.33 |
| November 3, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| October 1, 2025 | VCIT | $0.33 |
| October 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| September 2, 2025 | VCIT | $0.33 |
| September 2, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
| August 1, 2025 | VCIT | $0.34 |
| August 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.30 |
| July 1, 2025 | VCIT | $0.32 |
| July 1, 2025 | VCSH | $0.29 |
Key Differences
VCIT and VCSH serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
Both VCIT and VCSH charge an expense ratio of 0.03%, making annual fund costs identical. On a $100,000 portfolio, both charge $30.00 per year in management fees.
VCIT is the larger fund with $68.5B in assets under management — roughly 1.4x the size of VCSH's $48.3B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare VCIT and VCSH
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: VCIT charges 0.03% and VCSH charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VCIT or VCSH a better investment?
Whether VCIT or VCSH is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. VCIT and VCSH differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between VCIT and VCSH?
VCIT has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while VCSH charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.00% difference costs approximately $0.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, VCIT or VCSH?
VCIT has $68.5B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in VCIT vs VCSH?
Both VCIT and VCSH carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator