TLT vs VFH
TLT vs VFH · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | TLT | VFH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $86.79 | $121.32 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% | VFH |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $45.4B | $13.9B | TLT |
Performance Comparison
| Period | TLT | VFH |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -1.86% | -2.79% |
| 3M | +0.34% | -11.16% |
| 6M | -0.72% | -6.63% |
| YTD | +0.69% | -8.83% |
| 1Y | -2.29% | +16.52% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | TLT | $0.35 |
| March 24, 2026 | VFH | $0.38 |
| March 2, 2026 | TLT | $0.30 |
| February 2, 2026 | TLT | $0.33 |
| December 19, 2025 | TLT | $0.34 |
| December 17, 2025 | VFH | $0.68 |
| December 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.32 |
| November 3, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
| October 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.31 |
| September 24, 2025 | VFH | $0.42 |
| September 2, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
| August 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
| July 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
| June 26, 2025 | VFH | $0.47 |
| June 2, 2025 | TLT | $0.32 |
| May 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
| March 25, 2025 | VFH | $0.51 |
| December 18, 2024 | VFH | $0.66 |
| September 27, 2024 | VFH | $0.55 |
| June 28, 2024 | VFH | $0.46 |
Key Differences
TLT and VFH serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
VFH charges an expense ratio of 0.09%, which is lower than TLT's 0.15%. This 0.06% difference translates to approximately $60.00 per year on a $100,000 investment. Over a 30-year period, the compounding effect of lower fees could result in a difference of roughly $2,700.00.
TLT is the larger fund with $45.4B in assets under management — roughly 3.3x the size of VFH's $13.9B. Larger AUM generally correlates with higher trading volume, tighter bid-ask spreads, and lower trading costs for investors.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare TLT and VFH
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: TLT charges 0.15% and VFH charges 0.09%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TLT or VFH a better investment?
Whether TLT or VFH is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. TLT and VFH differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between TLT and VFH?
VFH has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while TLT charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.06% difference costs approximately $6.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, TLT or VFH?
TLT has $45.4B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in TLT vs VFH?
Both TLT and VFH carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator