SLV vs TLT
SLV vs TLT · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | SLV | TLT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $65.79 | $86.79 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.15% | TLT |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $46.2B | $45.4B | SLV |
Performance Comparison
| Period | SLV | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -11.42% | -1.86% |
| 3M | -4.76% | +0.34% |
| 6M | +51.17% | -0.72% |
| YTD | +2.13% | +0.69% |
| 1Y | +142.95% | -2.29% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | TLT | $0.35 |
| March 2, 2026 | TLT | $0.30 |
| February 2, 2026 | TLT | $0.33 |
| December 19, 2025 | TLT | $0.34 |
| December 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.32 |
| November 3, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
| October 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.31 |
| September 2, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
| August 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
| July 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
| June 2, 2025 | TLT | $0.32 |
| May 1, 2025 | TLT | $0.33 |
Key Differences
SLV and TLT serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
On the cost front, TLT (0.15% expense ratio) is more economical than SLV (0.50%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $350.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, SLV manages $46.2B compared to TLT's $45.4B. This size advantage typically means SLV has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare SLV and TLT
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: SLV charges 0.50% and TLT charges 0.15%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SLV or TLT a better investment?
Whether SLV or TLT is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. SLV and TLT differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between SLV and TLT?
TLT has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while SLV charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.35% difference costs approximately $35.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, SLV or TLT?
SLV has $46.2B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in SLV vs TLT?
Both SLV and TLT carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator