SCHA vs SCHX
SCHA vs SCHX · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | SCHA | SCHX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $29.52 | $25.86 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% | SCHX |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $20.7B | $64.1B | SCHX |
Performance Comparison
| Period | SCHA | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -1.14% | -3.52% |
| 3M | +1.23% | -4.55% |
| 6M | +5.07% | -1.77% |
| YTD | +3.79% | -3.63% |
| 1Y | +41.03% | +31.14% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 25, 2026 | SCHA | $0.04 |
| March 25, 2026 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| December 10, 2025 | SCHA | $0.13 |
| December 10, 2025 | SCHX | $0.08 |
| September 24, 2025 | SCHA | $0.09 |
| September 24, 2025 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| June 25, 2025 | SCHA | $0.08 |
| June 25, 2025 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| March 26, 2025 | SCHA | $0.06 |
| March 26, 2025 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| December 11, 2024 | SCHA | $0.17 |
| December 11, 2024 | SCHX | $0.08 |
| September 25, 2024 | SCHA | $0.09 |
| September 25, 2024 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| June 26, 2024 | SCHA | $0.08 |
| June 26, 2024 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| March 20, 2024 | SCHA | $0.05 |
| March 20, 2024 | SCHX | $0.07 |
| December 6, 2023 | SCHA | $0.12 |
| December 6, 2023 | SCHX | $0.07 |
Key Differences
SCHA (SCHA) and SCHX (SCHX) are both popular exchange-traded funds that investors frequently compare. Here is how they differ based on the latest available data.
On the cost front, SCHX (0.03% expense ratio) is more economical than SCHA (0.04%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $10.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, SCHX manages $64.1B compared to SCHA's $20.7B. This size advantage typically means SCHX has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare SCHA and SCHX
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: SCHA charges 0.04% and SCHX charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SCHA or SCHX a better investment?
Whether SCHA or SCHX is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. SCHA and SCHX differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between SCHA and SCHX?
SCHX has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while SCHA charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.01% difference costs approximately $1.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, SCHA or SCHX?
SCHX has $64.1B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in SCHA vs SCHX?
Both SCHA and SCHX carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator