NOBL vs SCHF
NOBL vs SCHF · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | NOBL | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $105.93 | $24.98 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | SCHF |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $12.0B | $62.9B | SCHF |
Performance Comparison
| Period | NOBL | SCHF |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -4.25% | -1.38% |
| 3M | +1.25% | +1.42% |
| 6M | +3.17% | +8.28% |
| YTD | +2.28% | +3.91% |
| 1Y | +14.54% | +41.72% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 25, 2026 | NOBL | $0.51 |
| December 24, 2025 | NOBL | $0.66 |
| December 11, 2025 | SCHF | $0.68 |
| September 24, 2025 | NOBL | $0.55 |
| June 25, 2025 | NOBL | $0.55 |
| June 25, 2025 | SCHF | $0.14 |
| March 26, 2025 | NOBL | $0.47 |
| December 23, 2024 | NOBL | $0.59 |
| December 13, 2024 | SCHF | $0.42 |
| September 25, 2024 | NOBL | $0.52 |
| June 26, 2024 | NOBL | $0.55 |
| June 26, 2024 | SCHF | $0.18 |
| March 20, 2024 | NOBL | $0.39 |
| December 20, 2023 | NOBL | $0.66 |
| December 6, 2023 | SCHF | $0.35 |
| September 20, 2023 | NOBL | $0.52 |
| June 21, 2023 | NOBL | $0.46 |
| June 21, 2023 | SCHF | $0.20 |
| December 7, 2022 | SCHF | $0.31 |
| June 22, 2022 | SCHF | $0.14 |
Key Differences
When choosing between NOBL and SCHF, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
On the cost front, SCHF (0.03% expense ratio) is more economical than NOBL (0.35%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $320.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, SCHF manages $62.9B compared to NOBL's $12.0B. This size advantage typically means SCHF has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing NOBL and SCHF. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare NOBL and SCHF
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: NOBL charges 0.35% and SCHF charges 0.03%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is NOBL or SCHF a better investment?
Whether NOBL or SCHF is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. NOBL and SCHF differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between NOBL and SCHF?
SCHF has an expense ratio of 0.03%, while NOBL charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.32% difference costs approximately $32.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, NOBL or SCHF?
SCHF has $62.9B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in NOBL vs SCHF?
Both NOBL and SCHF carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator