MDY vs SCHA
MDY vs SCHA · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | MDY | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $622.40 | $29.52 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.04% | SCHA |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $25.6B | $20.7B | MDY |
Performance Comparison
| Period | MDY | SCHA |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.20% | -1.14% |
| 3M | +0.74% | +1.23% |
| 6M | +4.25% | +5.07% |
| YTD | +3.42% | +3.79% |
| 1Y | +30.22% | +41.03% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 25, 2026 | SCHA | $0.04 |
| March 20, 2026 | MDY | $1.52 |
| December 19, 2025 | MDY | $2.18 |
| December 10, 2025 | SCHA | $0.13 |
| September 24, 2025 | SCHA | $0.09 |
| September 19, 2025 | MDY | $1.62 |
| June 25, 2025 | SCHA | $0.08 |
| June 20, 2025 | MDY | $1.80 |
| March 26, 2025 | SCHA | $0.06 |
| March 21, 2025 | MDY | $1.31 |
| December 20, 2024 | MDY | $2.08 |
| December 11, 2024 | SCHA | $0.17 |
| September 25, 2024 | SCHA | $0.09 |
| September 20, 2024 | MDY | $1.65 |
| June 26, 2024 | SCHA | $0.08 |
| June 21, 2024 | MDY | $2.00 |
| March 20, 2024 | SCHA | $0.05 |
| March 15, 2024 | MDY | $1.01 |
| December 15, 2023 | MDY | $1.89 |
| December 6, 2023 | SCHA | $0.12 |
Key Differences
MDY and SCHA serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
On the cost front, SCHA (0.04% expense ratio) is more economical than MDY (0.23%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $190.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, MDY manages $25.6B compared to SCHA's $20.7B. This size advantage typically means MDY has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare MDY and SCHA
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: MDY charges 0.23% and SCHA charges 0.04%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MDY or SCHA a better investment?
Whether MDY or SCHA is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. MDY and SCHA differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between MDY and SCHA?
SCHA has an expense ratio of 0.04%, while MDY charges 0.23%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.19% difference costs approximately $19.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, MDY or SCHA?
MDY has $25.6B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in MDY vs SCHA?
Both MDY and SCHA carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator