JEPQ vs NOBL
JEPQ vs NOBL · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | JEPQ | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $55.59 | $105.93 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% | — |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $34.6B | $12.0B | JEPQ |
Performance Comparison
| Period | JEPQ | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.58% | -4.25% |
| 3M | -2.29% | +1.25% |
| 6M | +2.45% | +3.17% |
| YTD | -1.76% | +2.28% |
| 1Y | +33.25% | +14.54% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | JEPQ | $0.56 |
| March 25, 2026 | NOBL | $0.51 |
| March 2, 2026 | JEPQ | $0.51 |
| February 2, 2026 | JEPQ | $0.47 |
| December 31, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.58 |
| December 24, 2025 | NOBL | $0.66 |
| December 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.55 |
| November 3, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.48 |
| October 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.45 |
| September 24, 2025 | NOBL | $0.55 |
| September 2, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.44 |
| August 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.44 |
| July 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.49 |
| June 25, 2025 | NOBL | $0.55 |
| June 2, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.62 |
| May 1, 2025 | JEPQ | $0.60 |
| March 26, 2025 | NOBL | $0.47 |
| December 23, 2024 | NOBL | $0.59 |
| September 25, 2024 | NOBL | $0.52 |
| June 26, 2024 | NOBL | $0.55 |
Key Differences
When choosing between JEPQ and NOBL, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
Both JEPQ and NOBL charge an expense ratio of 0.35%, making annual fund costs identical. On a $100,000 portfolio, both charge $350.00 per year in management fees.
In terms of fund size, JEPQ manages $34.6B compared to NOBL's $12.0B. This size advantage typically means JEPQ has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare JEPQ and NOBL
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: JEPQ charges 0.35% and NOBL charges 0.35%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is JEPQ or NOBL a better investment?
Whether JEPQ or NOBL is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. JEPQ and NOBL differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between JEPQ and NOBL?
JEPQ has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while NOBL charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.00% difference costs approximately $0.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, JEPQ or NOBL?
JEPQ has $34.6B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in JEPQ vs NOBL?
Both JEPQ and NOBL carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator