JEPI vs LQD
JEPI vs LQD · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | JEPI | LQD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $56.45 | $109.12 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.14% | LQD |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $45.0B | $32.0B | JEPI |
Performance Comparison
| Period | JEPI | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -2.98% | -0.87% |
| 3M | +0.13% | -0.11% |
| 6M | +2.93% | +0.05% |
| YTD | +0.53% | +0.15% |
| 1Y | +17.74% | +4.94% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | JEPI | $0.42 |
| April 1, 2026 | LQD | $0.45 |
| March 2, 2026 | JEPI | $0.35 |
| March 2, 2026 | LQD | $0.38 |
| February 2, 2026 | JEPI | $0.34 |
| February 2, 2026 | LQD | $0.41 |
| December 31, 2025 | JEPI | $0.43 |
| December 19, 2025 | LQD | $0.44 |
| December 1, 2025 | JEPI | $0.37 |
| December 1, 2025 | LQD | $0.41 |
| November 3, 2025 | JEPI | $0.35 |
| November 3, 2025 | LQD | $0.40 |
| October 1, 2025 | JEPI | $0.36 |
| October 1, 2025 | LQD | $0.41 |
| September 2, 2025 | JEPI | $0.37 |
| September 2, 2025 | LQD | $0.38 |
| August 1, 2025 | JEPI | $0.36 |
| August 1, 2025 | LQD | $0.44 |
| July 1, 2025 | JEPI | $0.40 |
| July 1, 2025 | LQD | $0.40 |
Key Differences
JEPI and LQD serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which fund aligns with different investment objectives.
On the cost front, LQD (0.14% expense ratio) is more economical than JEPI (0.35%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $210.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, JEPI manages $45.0B compared to LQD's $32.0B. This size advantage typically means JEPI has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
The data above reflects the most recent available information. Market conditions change frequently, and investors should verify current figures before making decisions.
How to Compare JEPI and LQD
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: JEPI charges 0.35% and LQD charges 0.14%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is JEPI or LQD a better investment?
Whether JEPI or LQD is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. JEPI and LQD differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between JEPI and LQD?
LQD has an expense ratio of 0.14%, while JEPI charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.21% difference costs approximately $21.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, JEPI or LQD?
JEPI has $45.0B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in JEPI vs LQD?
Both JEPI and LQD carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator