HDV vs IWM
HDV vs IWM · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | HDV | IWM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $133.99 | $251.29 | — |
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.19% | HDV |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A | — |
| AUM | $13.8B | $74.0B | IWM |
Performance Comparison
| Period | HDV | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -1.24% | -1.96% |
| 3M | +10.19% | -0.39% |
| 6M | +11.32% | +2.75% |
| YTD | +10.87% | +2.27% |
| 1Y | +24.33% | +40.18% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| March 17, 2026 | HDV | $0.84 |
| March 17, 2026 | IWM | $0.44 |
| December 16, 2025 | HDV | $1.25 |
| December 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.84 |
| September 16, 2025 | HDV | $0.95 |
| September 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.68 |
| June 16, 2025 | HDV | $0.91 |
| June 16, 2025 | IWM | $0.58 |
| March 18, 2025 | HDV | $0.80 |
| March 18, 2025 | IWM | $0.46 |
| December 17, 2024 | HDV | $1.12 |
| December 17, 2024 | IWM | $0.69 |
| September 25, 2024 | HDV | $1.23 |
| September 25, 2024 | IWM | $0.75 |
| June 11, 2024 | HDV | $0.93 |
| June 11, 2024 | IWM | $0.56 |
| March 21, 2024 | HDV | $0.84 |
| March 21, 2024 | IWM | $0.52 |
| December 20, 2023 | HDV | $0.98 |
| December 20, 2023 | IWM | $0.73 |
Key Differences
When choosing between HDV and IWM, several key metrics help distinguish these two ETFs. The following analysis covers the most relevant data points.
On the cost front, HDV (0.08% expense ratio) is more economical than IWM (0.19%). For a $100,000 investment, the annual fee difference is $110.00. Over decades, this cost advantage compounds meaningfully.
In terms of fund size, IWM manages $74.0B compared to HDV's $13.8B. This size advantage typically means IWM has better liquidity, making it easier to trade large positions without significant price impact.
These metrics provide a quantitative foundation for comparing HDV and IWM. Individual investment suitability depends on personal financial circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance.
How to Compare HDV and IWM
- If minimizing costs is a priority, compare the expense ratios: HDV charges 0.08% and IWM charges 0.19%.
- For liquidity, larger funds with higher AUM typically have tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient trading.
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is HDV or IWM a better investment?
Whether HDV or IWM is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. HDV and IWM differ in key metrics like expense ratio, dividend yield, and assets under management. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
What is the expense ratio difference between HDV and IWM?
HDV has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while IWM charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 investment, this 0.11% difference costs approximately $11.00 per year.
Which fund is larger, HDV or IWM?
IWM has $74.0B in assets under management, making it the larger fund. Larger funds tend to have better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
What are the risks of investing in HDV vs IWM?
Both HDV and IWM carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
See how expense ratio differences affect your returns over time → Expense Ratio Calculator