COST vs CSCO
COST vs CSCO · Last updated April 5, 2026
| Metric | COST | CSCO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,014.96 | $79.02 | — |
| Market Cap | $450.5B | $312.2B | COST |
| P/E Ratio | 52.92 | 28.42 | CSCO |
| Dividend Yield | 51.00% | 213.00% | CSCO |
Performance Comparison
| Period | COST | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | +3.30% | -0.70% |
| 3M | +16.06% | +5.12% |
| 6M | +11.19% | +17.60% |
| YTD | +17.86% | +3.69% |
| 1Y | +11.35% | +48.22% |
| 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| 5Y | N/A | N/A |
Dividend Comparison
| Ex-Date | Ticker | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| April 2, 2026 | CSCO | $0.42 |
| January 30, 2026 | COST | $1.30 |
| January 2, 2026 | CSCO | $0.41 |
| October 31, 2025 | COST | $1.30 |
| October 3, 2025 | CSCO | $0.41 |
| August 1, 2025 | COST | $1.30 |
| July 3, 2025 | CSCO | $0.41 |
| May 2, 2025 | COST | $1.30 |
| April 3, 2025 | CSCO | $0.41 |
| February 7, 2025 | COST | $1.16 |
| January 3, 2025 | CSCO | $0.40 |
| November 1, 2024 | COST | $1.16 |
| October 2, 2024 | CSCO | $0.40 |
| July 26, 2024 | COST | $1.16 |
| July 5, 2024 | CSCO | $0.40 |
| April 25, 2024 | COST | $1.16 |
| April 3, 2024 | CSCO | $0.40 |
| February 1, 2024 | COST | $1.02 |
| January 3, 2024 | CSCO | $0.39 |
| December 27, 2023 | COST | $15.00 |
Key Differences
COST and CSCO serve different roles in many portfolios. Understanding the specific differences in cost, performance, and risk profile can help clarify which asset aligns with different investment objectives.
CSCO offers a trailing twelve-month dividend yield of 213.00%, compared to COST's 51.00% — a difference of 162.00%. On a $100,000 investment, CSCO would generate approximately $213,000.00 in annual dividend income at the current yield.
COST has a market capitalization of $450.5B (mega-cap), which is 1.4x the size of CSCO's $312.2B (mega-cap). Larger companies tend to have more stable prices, while smaller companies may offer higher growth potential with greater volatility.
On a valuation basis, CSCO trades at a trailing P/E ratio of 28.4, while COST trades at 52.9. A lower P/E may suggest a more attractive valuation relative to current earnings, though it can also reflect lower growth expectations. The P/E ratio should be considered alongside other metrics and industry context.
All metrics shown are based on historical and trailing data. Forward-looking expectations may differ significantly from past performance.
How to Compare COST and CSCO
- Compare valuations: COST trades at a P/E of 52.9 while CSCO trades at 28.4.
- Consider company size: COST ($450.5B) vs CSCO ($312.2B).
- Review historical performance across different time periods (1-month to 5-year) to understand how each has performed in various market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or CSCO a better investment?
Whether COST or CSCO is more suitable depends on your individual investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. COST and CSCO differ in key metrics like P/E ratio, market capitalization, and dividend yield. This page provides objective data to help you compare the two.
Which has a higher dividend yield, COST or CSCO?
CSCO currently has a higher trailing dividend yield of 213.00% compared to COST's 51.00%. Dividend yields fluctuate daily based on stock price and are based on trailing twelve-month distributions.
Which company is larger, COST or CSCO?
COST has a market capitalization of $450.5B, making it the larger company by market value.
What are the risks of investing in COST vs CSCO?
Both COST and CSCO carry market risk — their values can decline during market downturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider factors like volatility, sector concentration, and your own risk tolerance when evaluating either investment.
Calculate your potential investment returns → Compound Interest Calculator